Health care act gets committee discussion

2012-07-25T16:32:00Z 2012-07-26T00:02:26Z Health care act gets committee discussionBy NICK SMITH | Bismarck Tribune Bismarck Tribune

Members of an interim legislative committee heard testimony Wednesday updating them on the implementation of the federal health care law.

Insurance Commissioner Adam Hamm discussed enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act with the Health Care Review Reform Committee. It was the first time the committee had met since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last month to uphold the law.

Hamm outlined the issue of creating a state-based health insurance exchange. The Affordable Care Act requires states to either set up a health insurance exchange or have the federal government put one in place. The exchanges are a set of state-regulated and standardized health care plans through which people can purchase health insurance.

“Because of all the fiscal, regulatory and political uncertainty that surrounded the exchange issue last fall, specifically November, I agreed with the North Dakota Legislature’s decision during the special session not to build and run a PPACA-compliant exchange,” Hamm said.

States have until Nov. 16 to inform the federal government if they will create a state-run exchange. During last November’s special session, the Legislature voted by a 64-30 margin not to do it.

“There is so much fiscal uncertainty regarding the exchanges that the best course of action, among a bunch of horrible options made available to the states, would be to make the federal government prove that they can make the exchanges work,” Hamm said.

The Kaiser Family Foundation, an organization that analyzes health care policy, has been tracking the progress of states in enacting the health care law. As of July 17, a total of 17 states are studying their options in implementing an exchange. Another 10 states, including North Dakota, have made no significant progress. A total of seven states have said they won’t be creating one.

State Sen. Tim Mathern, D-Fargo, asked Hamm about the possibility of a state-federal exchange. This model is basically the federal exchange, but the state is in charge of operating several elements of the program.

“What if we took that as a traditional partnership?” Mathern said.

Mathern asked Hamm if his opinion on the law would be affected if the fiscal responsibility were distributed between the state and federal government in a mutually beneficial way.

Hamm replied that he’s seen nothing to this point that would lead him to believe the federal government would do so.

Hamm also discussed the Affordable Care Act requirement for states to form essential health packages. Those packages must contain a number of benefits covering people in and outside of state health care exchanges, Medicaid and other programs. The original deadline the federal Department of Health and Human Services set for states to select their essential health package was Sept. 30.

“We received information from HHS late last week that Sept. 30 is now being termed a, quote, ‘soft date,’ because the final regulations have not been issued,” Hamm said.

Hamm said Health and Human Services now recommends, but isn’t requiring, states to submit their choices by that time.

“If a state fails to choose one of the benchmark plans, HHS will use, as a default, the largest plan by enrollment in the largest product in the state’s small group market,” Hamm said. He identified the largest plan that would be the default as the Medica Choice Passport plan, which has an approximate enrollment of 5,800.

Reach Nick Smith at 250-8255 or 223-8482 or at nick.smith@bismarcktribune.com.

Copyright 2015 Bismarck Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Reaction split on proposed flaring benchmark change

Reaction split on proposed flaring benchmark change

An environmental group official said Thursday the North Dakota Industrial Commission should hold the line in its natural gas flaring regulatio…

11 hours ago

Flood grant dollars canceled

Flood grant dollars canceled

Nearly $400,000 in flood-related project grant dollars not spent by communities across the state were canceled Thursday by the state land boar…

11 hours ago

Soil remediation project moves forward

A pilot soil remediation project at the site of a legacy oil drilling saltwater pit from the 1980s was approved Wednesday by the North Dakota …

August 26, 2015 5:30 pm

Delay on flaring benchmark sees debate

Delay on flaring benchmark sees debate

A decision to push back a Jan. 1 benchmark for the reduction of natural gas flaring was delayed Wednesday by the North Dakota Industrial Commission.

August 26, 2015 5:15 pm

Parties see opportunity in wide-open governor's race

Parties see opportunity in wide-open governor's race

Republican candidates for governor are anticipated to step up within a few weeks, according to North Dakota Republican Party vice-chairman Jim…

August 25, 2015 5:30 pm

Earlier on-sale liquor service mulled by Bismarck

The Bismarck City Commission Tuesday set a Sept. 8 hearing to consider allowing on-sale liquor service one hour earlier at bars and restaurant…

August 25, 2015 4:41 pm