Lessons from a guided tour of the oil fields

2012-07-22T02:00:00Z Lessons from a guided tour of the oil fieldsBy CLAY JENKINSON Bismarck Tribune
July 22, 2012 2:00 am  • 

As I wrote last week, I recently had the opportunity to spend a day in the North Dakota oil fields with Ron Ness of the North Dakota Petroleum Council and Blaine Hoffman of Whiting Oil’s Dickinson office. Last week I wrote about the technological ingenuity that allows us to send a steel probe more than two miles into the earth, then make it turn a 90-degree corner, and snake its way thousands of feet into the sweet spot of an oil-bearing shale formation. That formation is then pneumatically fractured (fracked) so that it releases the oil that has previously been locked in the shale. Current technologies thus allow us to extract gigantic quantities of oil (or natural gas) that would have been impossible to recover just a few years ago.

The best part of the field day for me was having the opportunity to pitch dozens of questions to two of the best-informed professionals in North Dakota. Here’s what I learned.

Dramatic improvements in the oil industry promise a light environmental footprint at each well site. The pads are much smaller now. Reserve pits—hazardous to birds, harder to reclaim—will soon be a thing of the past. Multiple wells can be drilled on a single site, and then maneuvered far underground to reach out laterally in every direction to the productive Bakken shale formations. According to Ness and Hoffman, as many as 20 wells could be drilled on a single pad, and already it is routine for several to be drilled at one site. This will greatly reduce the number of access roads required to develop Bakken oil. It will “space” the wells far enough apart to reduce or eliminate the visual blight, what we think of as the “classical Texas oil field” phenomenon. Because the oil shale is everywhere (not concentrated in randomly scattered deep pools as in traditional oil development) the fracking wells can be lined up, one every 640 or 1,280 feet for long distances along a single section line access road. This eliminates the need for a winding scoria access road to just one well (as in the past), and enables oil pipelines, service vehicles, power lines, water supplies, flaring collection pipelines, and other extraction logistics to be channeled along a single production corridor. Thus industry efficiency and a much lighter industrial footprint go hand in hand.

Reclamation is now outstanding. When the oil production at a well site ends, the company is required by law to reclaim the site: seal the well periodically throughout its length, bury the wellhead safely below the surface, remove the gravel pad, restore the landscape to its former contours, replace the topsoil that had been set aside when the pad was developed, erase access roads, and reseed the ground. We visited three former well sites in the National Grasslands north and west of Belfield. They were so superbly reclaimed that a casual visitor to the badlands would never be able to identify them. Even our hosts had some trouble finding the sites. Only a grass biologist would be able to spot the difference, at least until the prairie completes its own reclamation of the site. Conclusion: several decades from now, “when the landscape is quiet again,” it will be difficult to see much lingering evidence of the widespread industrialization of western North Dakota at the beginning of the twenty-first century.

There is really no way to slow the boom down. Leases on private lands require the oil company to develop the site within three years—or lose the lease. Leases on National Grasslands property provide a 10-year development window. (This is the reason that, so far, there has been less oil activity in the Badlands than on non-federal lands.) The success rate on Bakken wells is so great (over 99 percent), and the leasing activity has been so frenetic throughout western North Dakota, that there is what might be called a “structural urgency” to develop the fields. The only limiting factors at the moment are the finite number of available rigs and the availability of personnel and development capital. Ron Ness believes that it would not be desirable to slow things down in the Bakken oil zone even if there were a way to do so. The intense boom & rush dynamics, he said, are attracting outside investors to build hotels, permanent housing complexes, restaurants, shopping facilities, and a wide range of other amenities that are changing the quality of life in western North Dakota for the good. If you transformed the “gold rush” mentality to something less frenetic (assuming it were possible), these opportunistic outside investors might back away from investing in North Dakota’s future at someone else’s expense.

We must meet the urgent infrastructural needs of the impact zone. Ness believes that North Dakota needs to devote approximately $1 billion of the oil surplus per year for the next five or six years to build an industrial and community infrastructure that will enable the oil industry to develop the Bakken fields more efficiently, more safely, with less dust and disruption, and with less stress on wildlife and the landscape. This includes relief for the impacted communities, a vastly larger and sturdier highway system, improved airport facilities, bypass roads, ruggedized oil corridor roads, rest areas, increased law enforcement throughout the Bakken zone, and much more. There is both a moral and a practical urgency in this. Both Ness and Hoffman said that the state—not the industry—should undertake these infrastructural developments. Ness said that while this investment might seem gigantic, in the long run it will serve to increase rather than diminish the state surplus; that it should be seen as a state investment rather than an industry subsidy; and that it will go a long way towards easing the “growing pains” in the impact zone.

If you accept either of these two propositions—that the Bakken Oil Boom is on balance not only a good thing for North Dakota, but potentially one of the best things that ever happened in North Dakota; and that the boom is here, here to stay, huge and growing, and at this point there really isn’t anything that can be done to chasten it or slow the pace—then it is in all of our interests (from Fargo to Fairfield, Grand Forks to Grassy Butte) to find ways to manage the boom to the best of our ability, to ease the pain and strain in the impact zone in every possible way, and to invest the bulk of our current surplus in the oil zone’s aching infrastructure.

You know the television commercial: “This is not your father’s Oldsmobile.” One thing is absolutely certain.

This is not your grandparents’ North Dakota. Either we embrace the change or it will roll right over us.

(Clay Jenkinson is the Theodore Roosevelt Center scholar at Dickinson State University, as well as Distinguished Scholar of the Humanities at Bismarck State College and director of the Dakota Institute. Clay can be reached at Jeffysage@aol.com or through his website, Jeffersonhour.org.)

Copyright 2015 Bismarck Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(19) Comments

  1. stranger in a strange land
    Report Abuse
    stranger in a strange land - July 25, 2012 5:39 pm
    Well, we've known what he is. Now we know his price.
  2. real nodak
    Report Abuse
    real nodak - July 24, 2012 10:11 pm
    Makes a person sick. Amazing how the self-annointed 'great conscience of north dakota' did a 180 degree turn. No Art Link here. Direct quotes from tribune articles:

    Where Do You Draw the Line?
    by Clay Jenkinson
    April 29, 2012
    The oil boom is eating up North Dakota like a modified version of the old Pac Man video game. …………..No end in sight…………... We're a nation hopelessly addicted to carbon………………... But we have a right and a duty to set the rules of engagement, and we don't have to be squeamish about that or apologetic…………... The sanctity of North Dakota and its people is more important than the value of the oil……………... In addition to all of that, we need to decide—as a statewide community--what little bits of North Dakota we want to declare off limits to the oil avatar Pac Man…………….
    Where Do You Draw the Line?
    by Clay Jenkinson
    May 6, 2012
    That means designating some special places as off limits to oil development and to tax the energy industry as much as we can to make sure that the sovereign people of North Dakota are fairly compensated for the enormous sacrifice we are making in the sanctity of our landscapes and the quality of our daily lives………….We should decide, now, sooner rather than later, what we wish to spare. It will soon be too late. Maybe it is already too late……………Here's chilling, even appalling evidence of how thoroughly we have already sold our soul to the boom. The state of North Dakota has silently granted permits to Burlington Resources, a division of ConocoPhillips, to drill as many as 80 wells in a 30,000-acre lease area immediately surrounding Little Missouri State Park, 20 miles north of Killdeer, North Dakota……………You have a right to be outraged at a state government that would permit drilling within the park precinct itself. If there is any legal way we can still insist that--at the very least--no wells be permitted within the immediate vicinity of the park, we ought to make our views known to those responsible for this decision--with civility and firmness. I'm not willing to fight for much, but I'm willing to fight for this.
  3. JimmyCrackedCorn
    Report Abuse
    JimmyCrackedCorn - July 24, 2012 1:01 am
    Jenkinson says whatever he thinks will please the company he is in. Where the light goes on he will fly blindly to it. He and his books are self promoted and self published. I always figured the Tribune just needed to make the Sunday paper a little thicker.
  4. real nodak
    Report Abuse
    real nodak - July 23, 2012 10:06 pm
    What do you know? Mr. Jenkinson drinks the kool-aid.
  5. alanmo
    Report Abuse
    alanmo - July 23, 2012 8:11 pm
    Bought and paid for? Reads like it.
  6. alanmo
    Report Abuse
    alanmo - July 23, 2012 8:10 pm
    Bought and paid for? Reads like it.
  7. west dakotan
    Report Abuse
    west dakotan - July 23, 2012 7:48 pm
    We're getting rolled over whether we embrace the change or not. Come check out the dust pollution in the Killdeer area.
  8. 007
    Report Abuse
    007 - July 23, 2012 6:43 pm
    Thanks, Clay, for going to bat for the gutless, spineless Democratic NPL party and reconfirming the complete lack of standing up for anything, with the misguided notion that this will somehow convince voters that Democrats are conservative and pro-corporate and pro-oil enough for ND to vote for.
  9. watchman1
    Report Abuse
    watchman1 - July 23, 2012 9:32 am
    Another North Dakota journalist bought off by big interest for the price of a car ride and a cheap meal . Interview the common Joe Blow ( landowners , renters ,fixed incomes and etc) how they are being affected .
  10. Echt
    Report Abuse
    Echt - July 22, 2012 6:06 pm
    Reminds of the ol' argument that deforestation is better than forests, because the view is better and there's a significantly reduced risk of fire.
  11. Echt
    Report Abuse
    Echt - July 22, 2012 6:02 pm
    It's amusing that you think second hand information which fed to you verbally is supposedly research.

    You must be a Republican.

  12. sehr windig
    Report Abuse
    sehr windig - July 22, 2012 12:30 pm
    Is it safe to say Mr. Jenkinson is now a spokescoumnist??

    I wonder how long it will be before Sir Ness sits down at Montecello for a delightful conversation with the honorable President Thomas Jefferson on the Thomas Jefferson Hour??
  13. Rag Lib
    Report Abuse
    Rag Lib - July 22, 2012 12:16 pm
    Jenkinson is Bismarck's favorite punching bag.
  14. Echt
    Report Abuse
    Echt - July 22, 2012 12:08 pm
    Breaking news: Oil industry shills pile on the shilling when journalist is present.
  15. Radiohead
    Report Abuse
    Radiohead - July 22, 2012 11:52 am
    Mr. Jenkinson’s column illustrates what he has learned from “two of the best informed professionals in North Dakota," namely the head of the ND Petroleum Coouncil and a Whiting Oil and Gas executive. While no one should deny the expertise or the best intentions of these gentlemen, they are answering questions exactly how they should: in complete support of their industry.

    No doubt that with different chauffeurs, Mr. Jenkinson’s "dozens of questions" might have been answered differently.

    Back in April, Mr. Jenkinson held a different tone, noting that, “we have a right and a duty to set the rules of engagement, and we don’t have to be squeamish about that or apologetic. The sanctity of North Dakota and its people is more important than the value of the oil.”

    This new understanding would seem to suggest otherwise.


  16. westnd
    Report Abuse
    westnd - July 22, 2012 10:52 am
    Whine all you want but I admire anyone who can look beyond their party beliefs. Ol' liberal Mr. Jenkinson took the time to research an issue he has spent many a column on and is willing to change his stance based on information, not conjecture. More of us should be emulating rather than criticizing this behavior. As a “liberal” native North Dakotan living in the oil patch, I commend him.
  17. markefish
    Report Abuse
    markefish - July 22, 2012 9:04 am
    Wow, how much money did this writer receive for this from the oil field?
  18. joe blow
    Report Abuse
    joe blow - July 22, 2012 8:43 am
    Whoa there, What is wrong with renewing leases? thats what they have did for the last 50+pus yrs. and really no way to slow down the expansion . haha. Investerors are getting scalped too. wasting their money . If they only tjhey knew how? As much as says the big oil are saving their money when times get hard so they can make more profits. We are getting so dupped out here in western North Dakota . Shame on you Mr. Jenkinsins for believing the bull**** of those two.
  19. Radiohead
    Report Abuse
    Radiohead - July 22, 2012 6:53 am
    This is a sort of embedded journalism – a la Guerre d’Irak.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Ads

View All Ads